Today
heard on the radio to a Treasury official, who mentioned that the increase in gasoline did not need to affect inflation. According to this gentleman, and companies have made their adjustments for this time of year because the increases of 8 to 10 cvs. in each liter of gasoline and would be covered. Wow, what to say about this character, whose name I missed you know, the government is doing nothing that had not advised and also that according to his understanding, he saw no reason for the increases to fuel inflation to make rise. Obviously this guy is a classic government employee who has the face to tell such lies and without being moved to this, a single hair. The reality is different, as anyone can verify by going to a store and see what things cost. In fact, for the benefit of discussion, if all these companies, and advised of increases in gasoline, have increased the prices of their goods and products, thus, inflation, if not seen in this February plus, it would have been when those companies decided to raise their prices.
I wonder if these officials really believe what they say or just assume that listeners (and governance) are idiots. Because you can not understand that someone creates these arguments are idiotic extreme. What's more, today I read in the Excelsior (see illustration in this article), a note on the supposed "superheavy" Mexican, which remains less than 12.50 pesos per dollar, which seems extraordinary in this country. The article begins with this:
"
This year the peso against the dollar has approached levels not seen since the crisis of 2008. Yesterday, for example, touched 11.97 dollars. However not all good news.
Chamber of Commerce and analysts have warned that this phenomenon reduces export, since buyers have to spend more foreign exchange.
Given this, have requested that, following the revaluation of the peso, the federal government intervenes in the foreign exchange market.
"
Thus, according to this premise, having a weight, a strong currency is a bad idea, because it reduces exports. Let's see, think: Who believes this lie? A strong currency, stable, revalued, it is always currency better than a weak, unstable and devalued. Or who can refute this? Countries with stable currencies, inflation have fewer problems, fewer problems with the economy. ... So where did they get this idiocy? Surely the same Instead he left the staff that I mentioned before, trying to sell an idea for other stupid.
And do not think it necessary to know much about economics. No country likes to devalue its currency. To us it seems that we do like to live in these conditions of devaluation? I think not. In fact, each devaluation makes the government of this country means strictly rob people of their purchasing power of its portfolio. Strictly, for whatever reason, this is a robbery, where the capital of many citizens are going to waste.
But if we go further, we shall see (see chart), that the "superheavy" is a lie. Among the typical exaggerations the media and reality, it is clear that the peso has depreciated from 2008 to 2011, 20%. What then? Superheavy what did I talking about?
0 comments:
Post a Comment