Unix vs Mac vs Vista 
Via I hope you can understand! I leave something here that I have read and I super interested in:
"Wars of distributions" is a classic free software community, and often result in endless flames on mailing lists. Leaving aside fanaticism for one or other distribution, comparisons between them are useful for those who have to choose a distribution to install on your computer.
As far as purely technical, some notable features of Debian are:
* The high level of reliability, stability and standardization.
* Excellent documentation. Very complete.
* An excellent installer (I personally prefer the installers in console mode, since no one can rely on to properly configure the video card to work.) The main virtue of the Debian Installer is that one can do things automatically if you want, but you can control is going on and even switch to another virtual terminal and run the command that you want.
These and other aspects make Debian in my opinion one of the best distributions in binary format. No, but the stability and reliability of Debian, have a price packages for Debian stable version usually very outdated (even when you leave your next release, Etch will be quite up to date, at least for a while). Therefore, maybe Ubuntu or gnuLinEx (Debian derived distributions) are better alternatives for desktop machines (and are perhaps more friendly end user). The downside is that the dependencies of Debian is very strict. Specifies things like: package depends on the version X Y Z Bookseller This of course is needed to make a system that is distributed in binary format is really stable.
headaches when you start with Debian for example has a system running the stable version of Debian and need to install a package in a different version of the stable. (Of course, you can upgrade the entire system to "testing" or "unstable", but poque upgrade an entire system that works well in a trial or unstable for a single package?. Also This is clearly unacceptable in a system "in production"). For example it happened that I needed to install a newer version of X because it came with Debian does not support my video card. There
things get complicated: it can happen that one can, if dependencies allow, install the version in "testing" (testing) or you find a backport. But if the package has dependencies, it is often necessary to recompile it to work (or even modified by hand, because some units may be impossible to satisfy). Nothing to do: the source code is much more portable than the binaries.
Al Like Debian, Gentoo is supported by the community, and has a social contract similar to Debian.
The essential difference is that when you install a binary distribution, control gives much of his team to the developers of this distribution (Note, this is not necessarily a bad thing: if you are a non-technical user, it is much better rely on technical experts to do it one), whereas with Gentoo retains full control of your computer: you can specify exactly which version of a package to install. But control comes responsibility: Gentoo is often to read the documentation in detail to see how each thing and set the editing packages configuration files by hand. (However, the transfer of control of our team that involves the use of binary distributions is an essential difference whether it is free software, which happens to use proprietary software. This assignment is not irrevocable. At any time we need, we can take control in our hands: download the source code, compile and edit)
For developers and expert users, Gentoo comes in handy. Lets do exactly what you want with your system, easily. But only recommend it for them: for non-technical user, the last thing you want is having to compile every package from source source and configure it by editing the configuration files by hand, Gentoo is a nightmare (among other things: it is much more complicated to install than Debian).
Another situation in which Gentoo can be useful, as metadistribution to serve as the basis for generating binary distributions. For example, is what makes people Ututo.
There is no distribution can be everything to everyone, or that is universally better than another. Everyone must choose the one you like taking into account your circumstances and personal preferences. Via
Gwget bad lately I was downloading the files, so I decided to try the prozilla aka prozgui. Initially everything was normal, I have a bone to 256Kbits down under to 25.6 kb / s average, and down to that masomenos, between 24.7 ~ 25.3. Contentaso I leave the PC turned on all night and go to sleep ... when I wake up I see that detract from 7% and then extreme speed
Very happy I think this could be real since this month would speed up the connection:) waiting eager to reach 100% see what happens next ...
.. Look how well the bytes received: 707512 exceed the file size !!!!! and other estimates missing -24 seconds = O = O = O ... I thought so! ill be putting the numbers ... and will be finished off ... The story goes xD ... see:
101% !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -332 Seconds !!!!!!!!!! As normalized velocity was down ... But there's more ... remains another screen before canceling all, remember that a while ago exceeded the size of the file.
101%, 0 seconds remaining and down: 13102 kb / s 13 000 kb / S !!!!!!!!! WTFFFFFFFFFF !!!!!!!! Ahi
if I warmed up and delete it ....
prozilla but Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr #$%#$&$%/%&
In my opinion, there is a distribution that is better than another in all cases, but what is the best distribution in each case depends on the needs and preferences. 
These and other aspects make Debian in my opinion one of the best distributions in binary format. No, but the stability and reliability of Debian, have a price packages for Debian stable version usually very outdated (even when you leave your next release, Etch will be quite up to date, at least for a while). Therefore, maybe Ubuntu or gnuLinEx (Debian derived distributions) are better alternatives for desktop machines (and are perhaps more friendly end user). 
not mean to denigrate PCLinuxOS, no no no no no ... but this must be a hoax, or maybe the people of PCLinuxOS has invested some $ $ $ to win popularity with Distrowatch? ;) 
