Guil Russek once told me that journalism was a minor genre. His argument was based on, for example, an event occurs and journalists out to cover it. Once satisfied the curiosity about it and witnessed by facts, the journalist writes the note and sent the paper to be published in subsequent editions. The problem is you have to deliver now. No time to write carefully, to put a good style, etc. We must move in the newspaper and then to the urgency of the issue, care of writing the note passed to a second term. Not so with a book, for example. There the author writes a piece of his work. You can then edit, re-write, and even refuse the written to redo it because you may not like it. So then, to literature, writing a novel, a story, something that requires speed and agility of the news story is a genre more. And I agree with its assessment Russek. Moreover, it seems that there are journalists third and first. The third are those who go to places for the note, either a trivial matter as the shows or reporting an accident in the middle of the peripheral, or perhaps a fire. Often these characters are the raffle to find the best approach to the note. Instead, journalists are the ones that first come to the table: Lopez Doriga, Aristegui, Loret de Mola, who only showed up on some facts that in his journalistic approach could change the history of the world or because media attention is very important are present. So then, Lopez Doriga goes to the Vatican to report on the last day of the Pope or transmitted, with his "colleagues in sports," the opening of the World Cup, or, Loret de Mola is supposedly going to Egypt from creating a new world after the fall of the dictator in Egypt and the aftermath in other Arab countries such as Libya. But unfortunately for the reporter, not falling Ghadaffi in Libya, in the week he went to the land, so go back, not without keeping your finger off the line. 
For a journalist to have a unique something that makes you unique. So believe it when Lopez Doriga-sale-by telephone on the news of Loret de Mola, with the news that Chief
Diego was released. During that day, all the news talked about this, but many pointed out that Joaquín López Doriga had the scoop, as if the person gives the important note is that the report and not made reported. 
For a journalist to have a unique something that makes you unique. So believe it when Lopez Doriga-sale-by telephone on the news of Loret de Mola, with the news that Chief In my opinion, Lopez Doriga, in his gigantic ego, he forgets that the morning news is a co-worker, Loret de Mola and that he, in any case should have been the one who read the note, since this news came on the morning of that day . But no, it jumps to all this geek journalist because he wants to be the one to give such news to the whole country.
Not enough with that, Lopez Doriga, like other journalists do in their respective places in the electronic media, say things like "as I reported yesterday
here " as if they were the owners of the news. Lopez Doriga, like other journalists, are part of a technical working group to get out a box in the miracle that is television. These communicators are the last link in the chain so that the viewer or listener becomes aware of a material fact. But they are the ones who eventually read most of the time, news that others have written for them, so who is the person you are reporting?
The answer is simple: there is a person. It is a great group, ranging from writers, journalists third, those who actually go to the scene, the mechanisms of technology, internet, phone, messages, emails, in addition to engineers, technicians, stagehands, floor manager
, artificial satellites, news agencies, etc., quit working for a jerk on the air, a picture, and want to look by saying, "
return after these messages ." "Back?" You mean, how? Do you alone, cretinísimo Lopez Doriga, come back after the break? Do all your colleagues, that whole group that enables you to picture yourself shine, do not deserve even the slightest respect to accommodate them in the production of news where you, infamous Lopez Doriga, you're just the end reader the news? Why these insults to an entire team? How does it feel this so-called journalist? Only? "Unique? "Fantastic?
In my opinion, the owner of Televisa ears should pull you to this idiot and all those journalists who feel ownership of television news because they come in within the electronic media. In fact, Lopez Doriga insults even his boss, Azcarraga Jean, because he is her employer and because he goes to the box. But no matter. the ego of this evil character can only minimal education to accept that he does the news where it exits.
For my part, if he saw little López Doriga, it's time to veto it. One type of this kind, so lacking in respect for the work of own colleagues, should be removed from the media immediately, to see if he learns that nobody is indispensable and less on television, which today is gone tomorrow and the public have short memories. And forget about him when he enters the next one, which is sure to Loret de Mola.
was controversial figure during his lifetime - some critics called her work as pretentious or teasing - and since his death on February 22, 1987, is the subject of numerous retrospective exhibitions, books and documentaries. With this fame and controversy as well as his revolutionary works is considered one of the most influential artists of the twentieth century. 
morsa@la-morsa.com 
